Editorial standards
The rules our study resources are held to — so you can trust what you read.
What we publish
Our resources are study-skills and exam-prep education — how to learn efficiently, use active recall and spaced repetition, and build a sustainable routine. They are not clinical guidance and not patient-care instructions.
Accuracy and sourcing
- Factual claims about exams are grounded in primary, authoritative sources — for example the relevant testing body's official materials and published content domains.
- Learning-science claims are drawn from established cognitive-science concepts (such as the testing effect and spaced practice), summarized in plain language.
- We cite sources with a link, and we do not use an irrelevant source just because it mentions a keyword. We do not invent citations, statistics, or quotes.
Honesty
- No fabricated testimonials, reviews, ratings, user counts, awards, or partnerships.
- No promises of passing, of a specific score, or of guaranteed retention or clinical outcomes.
- We describe coverage as mapped to published content domains — educational, not exhaustive, and never a prediction of what will appear on an exam.
How AI is used
We use AI tools to help draft and organize educational material. AI output can be inaccurate, so it is checked against sources before publishing, and clinical or exam-specific claims are held for qualified review. See our AI disclosure and content review process for details.
Independence
RecallOS is independent and not affiliated with any certifying body or testing organization. Exam and certification names are trademarks of their respective owners, used descriptively.
Corrections
Found an error? We fix it. See corrections for how to report one and how we handle updates.